Chris Larsen
American programmer
Wikipedia-confirmed identity. Matched to Wikidata Q19864583 ↗ with a Wikipedia article ↗. Checked 2026-10-02.
This identity was added through Wikidata. Article mentions and historical relationships retain separate evidence.
American programmer
Organizations and connections
Affiliations retain their dates and sources. Roles may be historical; a missing end date does not establish a current role. Machine classifications need review; a co-mention alone does not establish a relationship.
Affiliated with
- Wikidata: Chris Larsen ↗Wikidata · P1416 · Statement Q19864583$CCB2C75E-DD36-401C-ABA8-3F46202139961 reference record retained in the source statement
- Wikidata: Chris Larsen ↗Wikidata
Founded
- Wikidata: Ripple ↗Wikidata · P112 · Statement Q16904931$35a877d3-41fe-3202-8b9c-c157421529dc1 reference record retained in the source statement
- Wikidata: Ripple ↗Wikidata
Educated at
- Wikidata: Chris Larsen ↗Wikidata · P69 · Statement Q19864583$4B6ADFA3-EFF4-494A-8D24-EAEA2AE8A118No external reference recorded in this Wikidata statement
- Wikidata: Chris Larsen ↗Wikidata
Educated at
- Wikidata: Chris Larsen ↗Wikidata · P69 · Statement Q19864583$68813620-FCBD-4D39-A47E-C087E0D6FB491 reference record retained in the source statement
- Wikidata: Chris Larsen ↗Wikidata
Works or worked for
- Wikidata: Chris Larsen ↗Wikidata · P108 · Statement Q19864583$165F1AD5-C2BE-4024-BC12-AC3A57BC18D31 reference record retained in the source statement
- Wikidata: Chris Larsen ↗Wikidata
Co-mentioned; relationship unclassified
Appearing in the same article does not establish a professional or personal relationship.
- Revealed: the tech bosses who poured $394.1m into US election - and how they compared to Elon Musk ↗www.theguardian.com · 2024-12-07
- Why did China hack the world’s phone networks? ↗www.theguardian.com · 2024-12-12
Co-mentioned; relationship unclassified
Appearing in the same article does not establish a professional or personal relationship.
- California’s billionaires pour cash into elections as big tech seeks new allies ↗www.theguardian.com · 2026-02-15
Co-mentioned; relationship unclassified
Appearing in the same article does not establish a professional or personal relationship.
- California’s billionaires pour cash into elections as big tech seeks new allies ↗www.theguardian.com · 2026-02-15
Co-mentioned; relationship unclassified
Appearing in the same article does not establish a professional or personal relationship.
- California’s billionaires pour cash into elections as big tech seeks new allies ↗www.theguardian.com · 2026-02-15
- California ‘billionaire tax’ makes ballot despite opposition from tech moguls ↗www.theguardian.com · 2026-06-19
Co-mentioned; relationship unclassified
Appearing in the same article does not establish a professional or personal relationship.
- Revealed: the tech bosses who poured $394.1m into US election - and how they compared to Elon Musk ↗www.theguardian.com · 2024-12-07
- Why did China hack the world’s phone networks? ↗www.theguardian.com · 2024-12-12
Co-mentioned; relationship unclassified
Appearing in the same article does not establish a professional or personal relationship.
- California billionaires up political action with multimillion-dollar donations ↗www.theguardian.com · 2026-03-11
Co-mentioned; relationship unclassified
Appearing in the same article does not establish a professional or personal relationship.
- California’s billionaires pour cash into elections as big tech seeks new allies ↗www.theguardian.com · 2026-02-15
- California billionaires up political action with multimillion-dollar donations ↗www.theguardian.com · 2026-03-11
Co-mentioned; relationship unclassified
Appearing in the same article does not establish a professional or personal relationship.
- California’s billionaires pour cash into elections as big tech seeks new allies ↗www.theguardian.com · 2026-02-15
- California billionaires up political action with multimillion-dollar donations ↗www.theguardian.com · 2026-03-11
Co-mentioned; relationship unclassified
Appearing in the same article does not establish a professional or personal relationship.
- California billionaires up political action with multimillion-dollar donations ↗www.theguardian.com · 2026-03-11
Co-mentioned; relationship unclassified
Appearing in the same article does not establish a professional or personal relationship.
- California billionaires up political action with multimillion-dollar donations ↗www.theguardian.com · 2026-03-11
Co-mentioned; relationship unclassified
Appearing in the same article does not establish a professional or personal relationship.
- Revealed: the tech bosses who poured $394.1m into US election - and how they compared to Elon Musk ↗www.theguardian.com · 2024-12-07
- Why did China hack the world’s phone networks? ↗www.theguardian.com · 2024-12-12
Co-mentioned; relationship unclassified
Appearing in the same article does not establish a professional or personal relationship.
- California billionaires up political action with multimillion-dollar donations ↗www.theguardian.com · 2026-03-11
- California ‘billionaire tax’ makes ballot despite opposition from tech moguls ↗www.theguardian.com · 2026-06-19
Co-mentioned; relationship unclassified
Appearing in the same article does not establish a professional or personal relationship.
- Revealed: the tech bosses who poured $394.1m into US election - and how they compared to Elon Musk ↗www.theguardian.com · 2024-12-07
- Why did China hack the world’s phone networks? ↗www.theguardian.com · 2024-12-12
Co-mentioned; relationship unclassified
Appearing in the same article does not establish a professional or personal relationship.
- Revealed: the tech bosses who poured $394.1m into US election - and how they compared to Elon Musk ↗www.theguardian.com · 2024-12-07
- California billionaires up political action with multimillion-dollar donations ↗www.theguardian.com · 2026-03-11
- Why did China hack the world’s phone networks? ↗www.theguardian.com · 2024-12-12
Co-mentioned; relationship unclassified
Appearing in the same article does not establish a professional or personal relationship.
- Revealed: the tech bosses who poured $394.1m into US election - and how they compared to Elon Musk ↗www.theguardian.com · 2024-12-07
- Why did China hack the world’s phone networks? ↗www.theguardian.com · 2024-12-12
Co-mentioned; relationship unclassified
Appearing in the same article does not establish a professional or personal relationship.
- California’s billionaires pour cash into elections as big tech seeks new allies ↗www.theguardian.com · 2026-02-15
Co-mentioned; relationship unclassified
Appearing in the same article does not establish a professional or personal relationship.
- California’s billionaires pour cash into elections as big tech seeks new allies ↗www.theguardian.com · 2026-02-15
- California billionaires up political action with multimillion-dollar donations ↗www.theguardian.com · 2026-03-11
- California ‘billionaire tax’ makes ballot despite opposition from tech moguls ↗www.theguardian.com · 2026-06-19
Co-mentioned; relationship unclassified
Appearing in the same article does not establish a professional or personal relationship.
- California billionaires up political action with multimillion-dollar donations ↗www.theguardian.com · 2026-03-11
- California ‘billionaire tax’ makes ballot despite opposition from tech moguls ↗www.theguardian.com · 2026-06-19
Co-mentioned; relationship unclassified
Appearing in the same article does not establish a professional or personal relationship.
- California’s billionaires pour cash into elections as big tech seeks new allies ↗www.theguardian.com · 2026-02-15
- California billionaires up political action with multimillion-dollar donations ↗www.theguardian.com · 2026-03-11
- California ‘billionaire tax’ makes ballot despite opposition from tech moguls ↗www.theguardian.com · 2026-06-19
Co-mentioned; relationship unclassified
Appearing in the same article does not establish a professional or personal relationship.
- California billionaires up political action with multimillion-dollar donations ↗www.theguardian.com · 2026-03-11
Co-mentioned; relationship unclassified
Appearing in the same article does not establish a professional or personal relationship.
- Why did China hack the world’s phone networks? ↗www.theguardian.com · 2024-12-12
Co-mentioned; relationship unclassified
Appearing in the same article does not establish a professional or personal relationship.
- Why did China hack the world’s phone networks? ↗www.theguardian.com · 2024-12-12
- California ‘billionaire tax’ makes ballot despite opposition from tech moguls ↗www.theguardian.com · 2026-06-19
Loading archive signals…
NYT archive discovery
These archive name values match this identity. Follow the article references to review each mention.